Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Complex data visualization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aaronantrim (talk | contribs) (response RE: subcategorization) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] and when it is too separate to qualify? -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST) | :What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of [[:Category:GTFS-consuming applications]] and when it is too separate to qualify? -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST) | ||
:Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST) | :Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --[[User:Aaronantrim|Aaronantrim]] ([[User talk:Aaronantrim|talk]]) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST) | ||
| + | ::True, I think I'm trying to weigh that against the possibility that most data visualization applications that will be useful for transit will have some way of using GTFS, although that may not be true. I'm probably getting too hung up though. I'll remove Data visualization as a sub category, and as I work on other categories movie forward I'll just try to see if they make sense as a sub category or not. -- [[User:Leeor|Leeor]] ([[User talk:Leeor|talk]]) 18:19, 5 February 2017 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:20, 6 February 2017
Sub-categorization
I don't think that this should be categorized under Category:GTFS-consuming applications --Aaronantrim (talk) 22:49, 3 February 2017 (MST)
- What guidelines should we establish for when something qualifies as a subcategory of Category:GTFS-consuming applications and when it is too separate to qualify? -- Leeor (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2017 (MST)
- Articles can be filed under multiple categories. My thinking is that some/many data visualization applications might well not be GTFS-consuming. --Aaronantrim (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2017 (MST)
- True, I think I'm trying to weigh that against the possibility that most data visualization applications that will be useful for transit will have some way of using GTFS, although that may not be true. I'm probably getting too hung up though. I'll remove Data visualization as a sub category, and as I work on other categories movie forward I'll just try to see if they make sense as a sub category or not. -- Leeor (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2017 (MST)