Difference between revisions of "Out-of-vehicle experience"

From TransitWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* [http://www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/pdf/JPT12-1Ryan.pdf| Sherry Ryan and Lawrence Frank. "Pedestrian Environments and Transit Ridership." 2009.]
 
* [http://www.nctr.usf.edu/jpt/pdf/JPT12-1Ryan.pdf| Sherry Ryan and Lawrence Frank. "Pedestrian Environments and Transit Ridership." 2009.]
 
* [http://pdx.edu/sites/www.pdx.edu.cus/files/PR119.pdf| Portland State University Center for Urban Studies. “Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements: Effects on Transit Use and Perceptions of the Pedestrian Environment In Portland’s Roseway Neighborhood.“ 1999.]
 
* [http://pdx.edu/sites/www.pdx.edu.cus/files/PR119.pdf| Portland State University Center for Urban Studies. “Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements: Effects on Transit Use and Perceptions of the Pedestrian Environment In Portland’s Roseway Neighborhood.“ 1999.]
 
===Universal fare media===
 
===Marketing===
 

Revision as of 23:05, 13 February 2012

Background

Certain low cost strategies, such as real-time arrival and routing information, attractive waiting areas, universal fare media, marketing/perception influence, and other low-cost measures can cost-effectively increase ridership by improving the transit experience.

Introduction

The out-of-vehicle waiting experience plays a critical role in an individual’s willingness to use transit for their traveling needs. A pleasant walk to and wait at a transit stop can add value to the transit experience, while time spent in a dirty, loud or unsafe environment is perceived to be much more costly that time spent in-vehicle (source)

Strategies

Real-time arrival and routing information

Attractive and more secure waiting areas

Improvement to the quality of pedestrian network